How to Commercialize a Medical Diagnostic

Mike Hull • September 2, 2026

Diagnostics are deceptively difficult to commercialize because analytical performance alone does not create adoption. A successful diagnostic must be technically reliable, clinically meaningful, operationally usable, economically justified, and supported by an appropriate regulatory and reimbursement strategy.

1. Define the Intended Use before Perfecting the Assay

The same underlying technology can become very different products depending on population, specimen, setting, user, claim, and clinical decision. Those choices affect validation, regulatory classification, workflow, reimbursement, and market size.


  • Who is tested?
  • Why are they tested?
  • What specimen is used?
  • Where is the test performed?
  • Who orders and interprets it?
  • What clinical action changes because of the result?

2. Separate Analytical Validity from Clinical Value

Analytical performance—accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, interference, reproducibility, stability—is necessary. Commercial adoption also depends on whether the result improves a clinically meaningful decision.



Build evidence around the comparator and outcome that matter to the intended user and payer, not simply the easiest study to publish.

3. Map the FDA Pathway Early

For IVDs, FDA classification and premarket requirements depend on device type and risk. Existing device types may follow 510(k), while a novel low- to moderate-risk device without a predicate may be eligible for De Novo classification. High-risk devices generally require PMA. When classification is uncertain, FDA resources, a Pre-Submission, or a 513(g) request can help clarify the pathway.

4. Build Reimbursement into Product Strategy

A test can be clinically useful and still fail commercially if no stakeholder has a reason to pay for it. Evaluate coding, coverage, payment, health-economic value, site-of-service economics, and who bears the cost versus who receives the benefit.

5. Validate Workflow and Adoption

Talk to laboratory directors, clinicians, administrators, payers, and procurement stakeholders. Understand sample logistics, turnaround time, instrumentation, training, reporting, integration, and the threshold for switching from the current standard.

6. Choose the Commercialization Model

Possible models include centralized testing, distributed kits, instrument-plus-consumable models, licensing, partnerships with established diagnostic companies, or strategic acquisition. The product design should fit the model, not the other way around.


BYB Takeaway

The best diagnostic commercialization plans begin with the clinical decision and work backward to the assay, evidence, regulatory path, reimbursement strategy, and business model.

Do not ask only, 'Does the test work?' Ask, 'What decision does it improve, and who will pay to improve that decision?'

Source notes

FDA, Overview of IVD Regulation: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/ivd-regulatory-assistance/overview-ivd-regulation

FDA, Laboratory Developed Tests FAQs: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/laboratory-developed-tests-faqs

By Mike Hull September 14, 2026
Commercialization requires a second layer of work: translating the discovery into a defined use case, protectable asset, development plan, evidence package, and funding strategy that a customer, licensee, investor, or strategic partner can act on.
By Mike Hull September 13, 2026
It is the operating logic that explains how a scientific asset can move from its current state to a product that can be funded, licensed, approved, adopted, reimbursed, partnered, or sold.
By Mike Hull September 12, 2026
There is no universal amount of validation required before a biotech company raises capital. Investors fund risk, so a company does not need every question answered.
By Mike Hull September 11, 2026
For university inventors, one of the most important commercialization decisions is whether to license the technology directly to an established company or form a startup to develop it further.
By Mike Hull September 10, 2026
The Bootstrap Score™ is a practical framework for asking a more useful question: how much of the commercial risk has been reduced around the science?
By Mike Hull September 9, 2026
A paper can establish an important scientific finding, while a buyer, investor, regulator, licensee, or strategic partner may still see substantial unanswered risk.
By Mike Hull September 8, 2026
There is another risk that receives less attention—the Valley of Dilution™. It occurs when a company raises expensive equity before key uncertainties have been reduced.
By Mike Hull September 7, 2026
The Bootstrap Flywheel™ is a different model: use each small de-risking step to make the next step easier, cheaper, and more credible.
By Mike Hull September 6, 2026
The most important financing question for an early biotech company is often not how much money to raise. It is what type of money should fund the next milestone.
By Mike Hull September 5, 2026
Venture capital is not inherently too early or too expensive. It becomes expensive when founders use it to answer questions that could have been answered first with smaller or less dilutive resources.